Kenneth Hite ([info]princeofcairo) wrote,

This Is Not A Funny Story!

Y'know, I'm beginning to suspect that there's a pattern behind all this.

Tim Burton's Penguin is a wannabe gothic theatrical impresario with torturous daddy issues.

Bryan Singer's Magneto is an artistic genius with (perhaps justified) persecution paranoia, who continually tries to build something lasting out of discards.

Brad Bird's Syndrome is a self-made genius who desperately wants to be accepted as an equal by his iconic peers.

Marvel Studios' Obadiah Stane is a malevolent corporate pirate who steals intellectual property with abandon.

Frank Miller's The Octopus is a power-worshipping psycho who turns Denny Colt into a monstrous revenant freak.

The interesting thing is how much of Miller's movie still worked, despite all the gratuitous damage and misunderstanding. Filming virtually the entire movie with no blue in the palette (except for the Lorelei Rox scenes -- a reinvention by Miller that I actually kind of approved of) makes no kind of sense, especially given that the Spirit wears a blue suit. But it works. (The other place they put blue? Gabriel Macht's eyes, which look brown in the publicity photos. The color-enhanced Macht, by the way, is a terrific visual match for the Spirit. It's like they sent an Eisner sketch to casting directors.) Miller's cityscape isn't Eisner's at all, but (again) it still works. Even giving the Spirit a sort of quasi-parkour (more Daredevil, really) doesn't jar too terribly badly. And some of it, Miller still gets right -- the fight scene at the beginning, while honkingly wrong for the film, is true to Eisner's original cartoonish fight choreography. The "Wildwood Cemetery" establishing shot is something that we could count on Miller not getting wrong, although (like the fight) it's misplaced in the film itself. Blending P'Gell and Sand Saref into one character is understandable, though only barely forgivable.

As an Eva Mendes delivery system, though -- top notch. A+. I feel like someone complaining the syringe they're shooting up with is the wrong color.

But it is the wrong color, and it's not just the absence of blue. Dolan is wrong (too confrontational). Ellen is wrong (too spineless). The Octopus is wrong, wrong, wrong (too flamboyant, wrong m.o., actually visible), and I could have lived the rest of my life happy without seeing Samuel L. Jackson in blackface. (Silken Floss, surprisingly, is pretty much right, although Scarlett Johansson apparently read her part off the storyboards in looping.) Sand Saref, as discussed above, is half-right for Sand, half-right for P'Gell. Officer Morgenstern is just horribly, horribly, horribly wrong, even though she doesn't appear (to my knowledge) in the original comic.

The fantasy is the wrong kind of fantasy; the violence (mostly) the wrong kind of violence. The jokes mostly don't work and almost always suffer from rotten framing, timing, and presentation. And the whole conceit is wrong. I'm sick of movies about ironically questioning the thing the movie's about. If you're going to pose a movie as an ironic commentary on comic-book conventions, don't film it in comic-book storyboards, don't have first-person narration (which Eisner's Spirit didn't, of course -- that's all Sin City), don't give your hero superpowers he doesn't have in the original material, absolutely don't have Samuel L. Jackson mugging for the cameras pulling cartoon guns out of his hat like the Judge in Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, and don't be vastly flatter and less human than the seven-page comic insert you're indicting for its alleged two-dimensionality. If you're going to ironically question the Spirit, do it like Eisner did in his own comic, with that beautiful old New York Jewish sense of the ridiculous. I am a bigger Frank Miller fan than most people these days, but he has no sense of the ridiculous.
Tags: comics, film talk

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 11 comments

[info]zoatebix

January 3 2009, 08:53:14 UTC 3 years ago

Wow. Amen!

[info]raconteurx

January 3 2009, 14:49:39 UTC 3 years ago

I wanted very much to like The Spirit, and did like parts of it, but overall I think Frank Miller should stay away from the director's chair. It wasn't as bad as I feared, but neither was it good. Only by degrees did it avoid being the kind of travesty Uwe Boll would have made.

[info]whswhs

January 3 2009, 14:57:58 UTC 3 years ago

I'm afraid that I told [info]chorale that she couldn't pay me to see The Spirit. I've seen Sin City and found some things to like in it—but Miller's whole sensibility is just wrong for Eisner's work, and I can't see him putting respect for the source material above his own preoccupations.

[info]whisper_jeff

January 3 2009, 15:30:58 UTC 3 years ago

I have not seen the movie but I have heard it's painfully bad, which does not surprise me. Frank Miller is a fantastic storyteller and a damn solid comic artist. He is not a movie director. He has been blessed to work alongside two very skilled and talented directors (two of the best directors to work on a comic-based movie, imho) and I'm sure he picked up just enough skills from their genius to convince others (namely studio executives) that he can make a movie, but he's not a movie maker. He doesn't understand the medium the same way he understands how to work comic panels; he doesn't understand how to work with actors in the same way he understands how to develop a story and its characters; he doesn't understand that when you don't know how to do something, you spend more time learning before leaping in with both feet and just do it.

I doubt I'll be going to see The Spirit any time soon. The trailers have utterly failed to intrigue me, Eisner never really held a nostalgic spot in my heart (despite being a giant in history of comics), and everything I've heard about the movie from people who should like it suggests the movie is, at best, bad and, at worst, horrendous.

Anonymous

January 3 2009, 16:07:36 UTC 3 years ago

The Spirit

I hope you got to see it on someone else's dollar.

[info]chaosclockwork

January 3 2009, 16:47:38 UTC 3 years ago

The Pattern Amuses

Well, it took me all morning to get the 'pattern', which caused me to burst out laughing and get odd looks from the rest of the library. Apparently, I am far too attracted to schadenfreude and cynicism.

[info]fengi

January 3 2009, 17:14:54 UTC 3 years ago

I a big fan of "that beautiful old New York Jewish sense of the ridiculous", and think it let Eisner include self-aware slapstick and serious drama in the same story with just a slight shift in style. He could imply depth beyond the simple genre types with both writing and drawing, and this human thread connected the comic and tragic without clashing.

Miller is less able to shift tones, especially between poignant and parody. His noir camp in the Sin City comics works becuase it's uniformly extreme when intentionally sad and intentionally funny. When I reread The Dark Knight as an adult, however, the satire is leaden and underlines the unintentional humor of the Batman bits. I think Elektra: Assassin works only because Bill Sienkiewicz is a master of mixing wildly divergent tones.

Sin City the movie works because Rodriguez and Tarantino are more like Eisner, able to locate a human thread in arch genre stories which melds the ridiculous, melodramatic and self-referential into a consistent whole.

They're also better at directing humans, and Rodriguez's skills at CGI on a tight budget makes the extremely stylized images seem organic. In every scene of The Spirit I've seen, the green screen technology is very present and seems a bit shoddy at the edges.

[info]cassielsander

January 4 2009, 18:42:32 UTC 3 years ago

Nice survey. I think you're particularly on-target about Elektra: Assassin. Maybe Sienkiewicz supplied the sense of the ridiculous that Miller lacks. The panel of Nick Fury running while carrying that gun that's twice as big as himself is practically a satire of Miller heroes in general.

[info]brand_of_amber

January 3 2009, 18:55:10 UTC 3 years ago

I think its that he's unable to disengage his sense of the ridiculous from his mocking sense of irony, and thus comes off less as a humane critic of humanity (like Eisner) and more as a shallow television without pity stereotype hating that which he loves to vainly try to prove his own sophistication.

[info]macklinr

January 3 2009, 18:55:40 UTC 3 years ago

I have to say that I enjoyed Sin City 2 The Spirit, but it's been said that my superpower is the ability to lower my expectation at films. For this, I went in knowing little about the original property, but enough to know that Miller was taking so many liberties to the IP that it'd be better called "loosely inspired by Will Eisner's The Spirit."

But I also went it looking to celebrate stylistic overacting. Going in with that mentality, the film did not at all disappoint.

[info]xnbach

January 7 2009, 16:45:02 UTC 3 years ago

I saw this last night and I am now filled with a renewed sense of hope because I know that whatever else I see in 2009, no matter how bad it is, it will still be better than The Spirit. No matter how bad things may get in my life, I can take comfort in the thought that I will never have to see this film again.

It was full of odd choices, as if Frank Miller was trying to make it bad on purpose. The whole Sin City done as an Adam West Batman Campfest made no sense to me as an artistic choice. The endless narration was ridiculous. The fact that Miller took Superman's "Help me mother, I am your champion" speech from The Dark Knight and gace it to Denny Colt so he could make the same pledge to Central City was simply bizarre.

Also, I don't know what Frank Miller's thing with Robin is, but I wish he would get obver it already.

The one thing I can agree with Miller about is the fact that Eva Mendes does indeed have a fine ass. Why he took so much time in his movie to convince of this fact is beyond me though. Mendes is hot, puppies are cute, water is wet, what else do you want to talk about now.

It's a godawful movie, but it's a bizarrely godawful movie.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…